- Main
- Society, Politics & Philosophy - Anthropology
- Power, politics, and tradition in the...
Power, politics, and tradition in the Mongol empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
Michael HopeWie gefällt Ihnen dieses Buch?
Wie ist die Qualität der Datei?
Herunterladen Sie das Buch, um Ihre Qualität zu bewerten
Wie ist die Qualität der heruntergeladenen Dateien?
This study provides a new interpretation of how political authority was conceived and transmitted in the Early Mongol Empire (1227-1259) and its successor state in the Middle East, the Ikhanate (1258-1335). Authority within the Mongol Empire was intimately tied to the character of its founder, Chinggis Khan, whose reign served as an idealized model for the exercise of legitimate authority amongst his political successors.
Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various factions within his army. In the years after his death, two distinct political traditions emerged within the Mongol Empire, the collegial and the patrimonialist. Each of these streams represented the economic and political interests of different groups within the Mongol Empire, respectively, the military aristocracy and the central government. The supporters of both streams claimed to adhere to the ideal of Chinggisid rule, but their different statuses within the Mongol community led them to hold divergent views of what constituted legitimate political authority.
Michael Hope's study details the origin of, and the differences between, these two streams of tradition; analyzing the role that these streams played in the political development of the Mongol Empire and the lkhanate; and assessing the role that ideological tension between the two streams played in the events leading up to the division of the Ilkhanate. Hope demonstrates that the policy and identity of both the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate were defined by the conflict between these competing streams of Chinggisid authority.
Yet Chinggis Khan's legacy was interpreted differently by the various factions within his army. In the years after his death, two distinct political traditions emerged within the Mongol Empire, the collegial and the patrimonialist. Each of these streams represented the economic and political interests of different groups within the Mongol Empire, respectively, the military aristocracy and the central government. The supporters of both streams claimed to adhere to the ideal of Chinggisid rule, but their different statuses within the Mongol community led them to hold divergent views of what constituted legitimate political authority.
Michael Hope's study details the origin of, and the differences between, these two streams of tradition; analyzing the role that these streams played in the political development of the Mongol Empire and the lkhanate; and assessing the role that ideological tension between the two streams played in the events leading up to the division of the Ilkhanate. Hope demonstrates that the policy and identity of both the Early Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate were defined by the conflict between these competing streams of Chinggisid authority.
Kategorien:
Jahr:
2016
Auflage:
First edition
Verlag:
Oxford University Press
Sprache:
english
Seiten:
272
ISBN 10:
0198768591
ISBN 13:
9780198768593
Datei:
PDF, 1.86 MB
Ihre Tags:
IPFS:
CID , CID Blake2b
english, 2016
Die Datei wird an Ihre E-Mail-Adresse gesendet. Sie wird in 1-5 Minuten geliefert.
In 1-5 Minuten wird die Datei an Ihr Telegram-Konto gesendet.
Achtung: Stellen Sie sicher, dass Sie Ihr Konto mit dem Telegram-Bot von Z-Library verbunden haben.
In 1-5 Minuten wird die Datei an Ihr Kindle-Gerät gesendet.
Anmerkung: Sie müssen jedes Buch bestätigen, das Sie an Kindle senden. Für die Bestätigung finden Sie den Brief an Ihrer E-Mail-Adresse von Amazon Kindle Support.
Die Konvertierung in ist im Gange
Die Konvertierung in ist fehlgeschlagen
Vorteile des Premium-Status
- Senden Sie an E-Book-Reader
- Erhöhtes Limit für Downloads
- Konvertieren Sie Dateien
- Mehr Suchergebnisse
- Andere Vorteile